Thursday, December 15, 2016

Commentary: Update on the Markets


Dollar/FX. Stronger US dollar is a consensus trade, and there's no compelling reason to be contrarian. Rate hikes from the Fed will be dollar positive, but more importantly loose fiscal policy will gin up the economy, and make dollar denominated assets more attractive to international investors. (Both FDI and portfolio flows should increase as a result) This, much more than interest rate differentials in overnight policy rates, will drive up the dollar in the next two to three years.

Notice the sharp contrast in policy out of Mexico, the emerging market hit hardest by the Trump shock. The central bank is hiking interest rates, and brought overnight rates up to 5.75 percent, a full five hundred basis point differential with the United States. However, the Mexican Government continues to cut public spending, which hurts the broader Mexican economy. As such, while holding overnight Peso balances is more attractive than before due to Banixo's rate hikes, holding longer duration Mexican assets, such as stocks or real property, is less attractive because government austerity is slowing the economy. While Mexican authorities remain terrified of further Peso depreciation, under this policy regime, it will be hard for the Peso to regain a strong footing. I expect the MXN to remain in a range between 20-21.5 for next few years.

Bonds.

Yields have shot up since the election. Trump's fiscal splurge will both increase the supply of Treasury securities, and give the Fed cover to hike rates. Both these factors point to lower bond prices and higher yields. However, investors appear overly confident that Trump can deliver a massive spending package. It appears more likely than not that a Republican Congress with acquiesce to Trump's demands, but it seems unlikely that Trump can deploy one trillion dollars of infrastructure spending quickly. Thus, the deficit (and therefore government's financing needs) may be much lower in the next few years than investors expect. This could keep yields lower, and will also weigh on stocks. Under this scenario, a correction in the dollar is also possible. On the upside, Republicans might be able to pass large tax cuts, and politically justify the increase in the deficit by using so called "dynamic scoring." Politics, aside, an increase in the deficit always and everywhere increases private sector incomes, which boosts corporate earnings as consumers spend more. Big deficits will be good for stocks. It would take an unknown event, such as a major war or another financial crisis, to halt this rally.

Stocks.

As stated above, the stock market remains broadly supported by the impending fiscal bazooka about to go off. However, one sector that appears a bit overbought already are regional banks. Dodd-Frank repeal won't help earnings too much. Small banks just can't compete with the scale and scope of larger banks, especially on the technological front. Although many on the right claim that the new regulatory burden on them is higher, the real problem they face is a shrinking customer base as consumers increasingly choose the speed and convenience of the mega-banks. Going forward, I don't expect regional financials to outperform the broader market.

Friday, November 18, 2016

Comentario: El Banco de México Debe Aclarar su Política sobre el Peso

El gobierno mexicano esta obviamente preocupado por el peso. Cuando se dio claro de que Trump iba a ganar el ocho de Noviembre, el Banco de México y  la Secretaria de Hacienda y Crédito Publico anunciaron una conferencia de prensa juntos. Después de no anunciar nada concreto, el peso comenzó a bajar de nuevo.  El mercado se quedó muy confundido. Porque señalar medidas de emergencia sin intención de tomarlas?     

Por su parte, el Banco de México incrementó su tasa de interés objetivo en 50 puntos básicos.  En su declaración que acompañó el incremento al alza, el banco central destacó que  la inflación en México sigue registrándose encima de su objetivo de tres por ciento y que <<el  balance de riesgos para el crecimiento presentó un deterioro adicional.>>   Normalmente, una ambiente económica en que no hay presiones inflacionarias y el crecimiento esta restringido por la incertidumbre, una monetaria mas laxa sería lo apropiado. El hecho de que el banco central decidió incrementar la tasa interbancaria en este entorno indica que claramente esta muy preocupado por el tipo de cambio

Pero aun en el contexto de las medidas ya tomadas, el gobernador del Banixo Agustín Carstens varias veces ha insistido en que México esta cometido a un tipo de cambio flexible y que el Banixo no va a usar política monetaria para lograr un nivel especifico para el peso frente al dólar u otras monedas extranjeras.  (en mi opinión, el tipo de cambio flexible que se implemento después de la ruptura del 1994 es indispensable para México, pero eso es otro tema)

En suma, lo dicho no conforma a lo hecho. Si México quiere respaldar al peso o hacer que se aprecie, hay que declararlo explícitamente y tomar la medidas adecuadas. Solo un incremento grande, a la orden de 500 puntos básicos hará que el peso sea suficiente atractivo para inversionistas extranjeros para que la moneda nacional suba frente al dólar.   Incrementos moderados, como el que se anuncio ayer, son para arrestar el crecimiento del crédito bancario y suprimir la demanda interna, no soportar la moneda nacional. Si el gobierno no quiere un peso mas fuerte, las apenas tomadas acciones por banco central son para nada porque son para resolver problemas que México no tiene. (Inflación, burbujas de crédito) Pero si el gobierno esta tratando de respaldar al peso aunque no lo admite, lo hecho no es adecuado.  Independientemente de  su intención, el Banco de México, junto al gobierno federal, debe de aclarar su politica sobre el peso.